I hate Sprint Customer Service

Sprint Facing $1.2 Billion Class-Action Lawsuit

The suit claims that the company’s early termination fees violate laws in several states as well as the Federal Communications Act.

By Marin Perez
November 6, 2008 05:00 AM

Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S) is facing a $1.2 billion class-action lawsuit over claims that it wrongly charged customers early-termination fees.

In July, a California judge ruled that the third largest U.S. wireless carrier had to pay $73 million over these cancellation fees. The attorney in that case, Scott Bursor, has now filed a federal lawsuit which claims the $150 and $200 fees violate laws in every state as well as the Federal Communications Act.

“After a full trial on merits, we proved that Sprint Nextel’s termination fees violated California’s law,” Bursor said.But Bursor may be jumping the gun a bit, as the California ruling is not final. A California judge will hear arguments from both sides Thursday, and a final ruling is expected within 90 days.

Sprint has not responded to press inquiries regarding the national ETF lawsuit, but the company did recently finalize a new pro-rated ETF policy. The mobile operator said its $200 fee will be reduced by $10 per month after month six. The adjusted cancellation fee will only apply for new contracts, but existing subscribers can get it by renewing their service agreement.

All four major U.S. wireless carriers have a cancellation fees, and nearly all of them have faced multimillion-dollar lawsuits over them. The mobile operators say these fees are crucial in recouping costs of heavily-subsidized handsets, but consumer advocates say they are overly punitive and stifle consumer freedom to switch carriers.

The Federal Communications Commission has even leapt into the discussion, and is mulling a plan to create a nationwide policy.

“While I’m respectful of state regulators, I have been skeptical that lawsuits are a good way of ensuring protection for all consumers,” said Kevin Martin, the FCC’s commission chairman.

I’m looking to join a class action law suit for Sprint also!
Read below but here is the short list:
I did not like my service from day one because of plan they gave me.
They placed a 125 dollar cap on my phone which meant that as soon as my bill reached 125 the phone would be cut off until I made a payment.
Then it would take 4 hours to turn back on. So in the middle of the month I had to make a second, early payment to keep my service from being interrupted because my bill was always over 125.
I was charged for internet access even though I could never use it due to network problems.
My phone could not get text messages.
When I tried to find a plan to fit my usage patterns they extended my contract with out my permission.
I have paper and soft copies of all my payments to Sprint and stayed with them past my original 2 year contract agreement.
When I went to cancel my service, they said I was behind in payment by a month and charged me an early termination fee.
Then they sent the fraudulent debt to collections and then to my credit report.
It has been on my credit report for over 4 years now and has prevented me from getting loans and good credit ratings.
It’s 500 bucks but I have not been willing to let them win.
They are shady.
Sprint Customer Service is the worst!
After years of terrible service I am pleased to finally fire Sprint! Even suffer the 180.00 termination fee. But after paying 135-145 bucks a month for my cell phone it wont hurt as bad as staying with them. I can’t even send text message and I’ve been charged for Internet access even though I can’t access the Internet due to “network” problems.
Sprint customer service is pathetic, once you actually get to a live person they can’t help you do anything and mostly can’t understand English. I’ve been trying to get plan that has 800 min, nights and weekends, mobile to mobile, and text messaging for under 100 a month. This is impossible with Sprint. No matter which plan I choose, my bill is always 135-145 bucks and every time I change plans they add more time to my contract without my permission. It’s a very shady company.
But what really pisses me off is that from day one they gave me a credit limit of 125.00 and refuse to raise it. So, since my bill is at least 130-145 a month, towards the end of the month, my service will be interrupted when I hit the 125.00 limit until I make a payment bringing it under the 125 amount. My phone will only go to their automated payment system and then once you make a payment, it can take up to 4 hours to get service back.
To top things off, when I canceled with them, not only did they charge me for early termination of the contract even thought I did not give them permissions to extend it. They claim that I was a month behind in my payment which is a lie and impossible because of the credit limit and I have proof of all my payments. So they will never get the 500.00 they are trying to steal from me and they are bastards for placing it on my credit report. I can’t wait for someone to file a class action suit against them. This type of scam is not allowed in European countries, only US citizens are made to suffer this treatment. Why does our government protect and promote these scam artist? Follow the money!
I hate Sprint now and plan to let everyone I know how bad of a company they are. So if you want cell phone service, don’t use Sprint. Don’t fall for their new CEO’s BS either. Until they get rid of their contracts they will be shady.
Great comment I found on the link above.
This business model is the same concept as junkies pushing free samples (phones) to get folks hooked (in a contract).

Secondly, if your phone was portable across carriers, then they wouldn’t have a way to force new equipment on us (with their associated contracts): people would buy their own phones, and if the carrier didn’t take good care of them, they would be free to switch their phone over to another carrier. By keeping their equipment locked into a single network and imposing a service contract to “offset equipment costs”, they don’t have to worry about providing good service.

Which brings me to the actual equipment costs…Do you really think the phone company is giving you a $700 or $800 phone for free (or even for $299)? You’re just kidding yourselves! There’s no way a business is going to subsidize the purchase price by $500 if they charge an ETF of $200…it just doesn’t make sense, even if they expect to recover the cost over a 1 or 2 year period. To subsidize $500, you would need to recover $20/month over 2 years; either we’re way over-paying for cell phone service, or else the companies have inflated the actual amounts they’re subsidizing.

Also, you can’t justify the ETF model when it doesn’t change based on the cell phone carrier’s liability. For example, if I buy a basic phone, my termination fee is the same if someone buys the “latest and greatest with all the bells and whistles”. Yet the cell phone provider has a much-reduced liability with my basic model.

If the ETF model were based on carrier liability, then you wouldn’t need a contract for buying the phone outright or just extending your contract. (What’s their liability if I pay for the equipment outright? Maybe $5 or 10 to process my account…that’s it.) This is a revenue stream, plain and simple.

Finally, wildcatherder mentioned the “GoPhone”. People who think cellphones cost big bucks should really look at how this model operates…a basic phone is $30, nicer one is $50-60, and a good phone is about $100, and a RAZR is less than $135. This is close to the actual cost because there’s no contract to subsidize it. Yes, you pay more for your airtime, but there’s no guarantee that you’ll ever refill it often enough to offset the subsidy.

(BTW – if you lose or destroy your cell phone and the carrier tries to charge you $300 for a replacement, buy a cheap GoPhone at a department store (but don’t let them register it for you!) and install your SIM card in it…ta-da! The cell phone company will try to tell you that it won’t work because they want you to spend top-dollar for the same phone, but it does. It got me through 6+ months, when my previous cell phone took a swim.)



A California judge has ruled that Sprint Nextel must pay $73 million in refunds to its former customers in a lawsuit over early termination fees.  However, a Sprint spokesman says that the ruling is tentative and the company has two weeks to come up with a response to this decision.

Consumer advocates are calling this preliminary decision a victory and saying that early termination fees unfairly restrict consumers from switching service. Wireless operators, meanwhile, say that ETFs are necessary because they subsidize a portion of the cost of the device and need to recoup those expenses.

This court decision comes at a time when the FCC is considering a nationwide ETF policy for carriers. Verizon has advocated that the commission adopt rules that are similar to what the operator has in place. For example, carriers should offer opt-out or trial periods for new contracts; provide pro-rated ETFs; and offer no ETFs for contract renewals unless the consumer gets a new device as part of the deal.

Verizon recently settled a similar suit for $21 million. The carrier didn’t admit to any wrongdoing but said that $21 million, which is the maximum amount it was liable for, will be doled out to plaintiffs and will cover attorney’s fees.


One response to “I hate Sprint Customer Service

  1. I’m Curious as to your $180 charge. Sprint is trying to charge me $200 each line i have and want to cancel. Did you do anything special for the $180 charge?

    thx and congrats

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s